Jeremy Richards ([info]jeremyrichards) wrote,
@ 2002-07-20 09:39:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:delusions of grad school

Yin::Yang/Ping:: . . .
James Austin notes that auditory filtering alters depending on the novelty of the stimulus. Expected and predictable content filters through a presumptive measure of judgment before registering. In other words, we're more subjective with cliches and conventions, "as though the brain had been making quasi-mental, reflexive associations at several different levels." We "see it coming," which is an interesting phrase, given that the brain's context for the predictable is primarily within the parietal regions, committed to place--where it's coming from.

With novel stimulus, however, the auditory cue seems to bypass some of the subjective processing, and the waveform actually shows potential earlier. It leaps right up and kicks out the steady, predictable mindset, registers potential primarily within the frontal lobes, and provokes a "what" response as opposed to a "where."

Where Austin leaves off is where I'm interested in following. That is, what about the content that is both unexpected and inevitable? This is a motif in my aesthetic theory, and the neurological angle makes a perfect opportunity to look for facts that support what I assumed all along. OK, so what I mean by "unexpected and inevitable" (a phrase I picked up from a screenwriting book, I think) is that the most striking aesthetic satori makes us respond, simultaneously, "Wow, I didn't expect that" and "Oh, of course, that's exactly what I should have expected." If it merely meets our expectations, we're not impressed. If the content is only novel, with no context of expectation, then it's simply non-sequitur. Granted, I'm a huge champion of the non-sequitur, but anyone who's read Mark Leyner at a stretch knows it can become exhausting. Potato salad.

So when we hear an ingenious joke or "mind-bending twist" in a story, it provokes a visceral reaction, be it laughter, tears, chills, heart murmurs, or spontaneous tap dancing. We feel moved. Meanwhile, inside the brain, I imagine a nanosecond pingpong match between the frontal and parietal lobes, where the predictive and novel stimuli strike, respectively. A sort of, "Ah, wait, what, oh, yes, ha, oh, of course, but then, tada!" all condensed into a split second "awwoyhoocbtt!"




(Post a new comment)


[info]euziere
2002-07-20 12:24 pm UTC (link)
That looks like a great book. And the library here has it. I think I will go check it out and feed my sadly neglected biopsych interests.

I remember hearing a while ago about humor being what happens when part of your brain thinks "oh my god, it's a monster!" and the other part thinks "oh, it's just a kitten!". My undergrad biopsych prof said that laughter has the function of synchronizing your brain waves, essentially resolving the contradiction between the two (and as a side benefit, alerting the rest of the tribe to the fact that there is in fact no actual danger). So I believe there's been research done supporting just what you suggest here. Unfortunately, I don't have a reference.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]euziere
2002-07-20 12:24 pm UTC (link)
arrgh. Change "fact that there is in fact" to "the fact that".

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]euziere
2002-07-20 12:25 pm UTC (link)
no, change it to "fact that there is". (sigh)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re:
[info]jeremyrichards
2002-07-22 07:47 pm UTC (link)
That sounds fascinating. If you happen upon the reference, or if the professor has a suggestion of where to look, let me know. Thanks.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]roxann_ireland
2002-07-24 11:32 am UTC (link)
I wonder if that doesn't account for how rhyme works in a poem--rhyme makes the end of the following line predictable to some degree. Thus a a badly rhymed poem bores either with a "here it comes, there it goes" predictability or irritates with a barrage of tortured syllables and betrayed expectations. But a rhyme that meets and exceeds it's basic sonic requirements creates it's own version of that "awwoyhoocbtt!" response you describe.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re:
[info]jeremyrichards
2002-07-24 04:03 pm UTC (link)
Exactly. It's all about expectation, which is why syncopation and internal rhyme can be so effective.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Notice
(Anonymous)
2002-07-25 11:58 pm UTC (link)
I'd like everyone to notice what Jeremy did just there with the potato salad.

-- Dan S.

(Reply to this)


[info]halnewcome
2005-01-20 07:55 pm UTC (link)
you use "than" when you mean "then".

This is compelling and insightful. It's the sort of "what does the color red look like to you?" question that intrigues me. However, whereas I give up on the inquiry, you seem interested in pusuing it to the bitter end. I wish you the best of luck [and goddammit I'm pulling for you all the way].

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jeremyrichards
2005-01-20 08:44 pm UTC (link)
good grammar note.

Thanks. It's more of a hobby until the funding comes through.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

potato salad
[info]claudelemonde
2005-01-20 09:49 pm UTC (link)
same thing, too, sadly, when you munch a collection of Ray Carver's short stories in one sitting. the mental equivalent of the blatty "wah wah wah WAAAAH" horn.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…